May 21, 2012

NewsFeed: Trying To Find Houses For The Formely Incarcerated

Police handcuffs

Image via Wikipedia

Even out of prison people with a criminal background still cannot seem to get a break. For the formerly incarcerated finding a home can be difficult especially when landlords can choose to bar such individuals. A toolkit or guide was developed by Fortune Society and John Jay College Criminal Justice to help people with a criminal past to find education and housing.  National Reentry Resource Center presents a webinar that reviews the toolkit as well as other findings to aid people with criminal histories.

Sources- National Reentry Resource Center

NewsFeed: The Crime Report Developed A Top Ten List for Criminal Justices Stories of 2011

crime reporting

Image by BryanAlexander via Flickr

The Crime Report, published by the Center on Media, Crime and Justice at John Jay College of Criminal Justice,with the help of contributors and bloggers complied a list of top ten Criminal Justice stories of 2011. The stories were according to The Crime Report to be significant and interesting in terms of Criminal Justice. Topics on the list include changes in corrections, re-evaluating the reliability of eyewitnesses identification, and redefining what rape is.

Source- The Crime Report

NewsFeed: Murder Is Down, But Why?

English: A federal agent making an arrest duri...

Image via Wikipedia

This year alone New York City has experienced its third lowest homicide rates of 502. The lowest being in 2009 of 471 and the second being in 2007 of 499. The decline in homicide is also more significant or sharper in the city than anywhere else in the nation. Mayor Bloomberg attributes the decrease to the work of police and fire departments but experts are not too sure about that. Experts such as Andrew Karmen, sociology professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, attributes the decline to the current lifestyle of young adults. Karmen believes because young adults from ages 18 to 24 are attending colleges,  they are less likely be murdered then young adults that do not attend college.

Racial Profiling

By Alexis To
Staff Writer


“I see my fellow Asians typically in Brooklyn on 8th Avenue, Chinatown, and Flushing being stopped by police officers to be questioned and searched,” said Jacky Wang, a junior at Queens College.

 Asians are negatively stereotyped and because of racial profiling, they are wrongfully assumed to sell bootlegged merchandise to customers. Asians are often stopped by police officers if they see them carrying large luggage or bags because they have the suspicion that they may be selling fake designer merchandise.
“I was stopped by a police officer and I refused to let him search me, and I was taken to the precinct,” said Stuart Lee, a 4th year high school student. The police stopped Lee and asked him to be searched because of the way he dressed: cap, baggy jeans, and loose shirt, which fit the description of a how a typical thug would dress. When he was taken to the precinct they searched him. After their search, they found a pocketknife that is used to open bottles and peel fruits and he was charged with possession of an illegal weapon. He was sentenced to one month of community service for an item that is used to make his life easier
 Margaret Chin, City Councilwoman of Chinatown proposed a bill that will make it a misdemeanor to buy fake designer merchandise. Those who are charged with buying fake designer merchandise can face up to one year in jail, as well as a possible $1000 fine. This will heavily impact the Asian community in Chinatown because Canal Street is known to have many venders selling fake designer merchandise. If this law gets passed, then Chinatown will be a target for police officers to racially profile anyone passing.          
Some think that stopping and searching is wrong because it limits an individual’s freedom. “I feel that stopping and searching Asians by racial profiling is wrong because then police are able to search people in Chinatown and give them fines for wearing fake products if Ms. Chin’s bill is passed,” said Wilson Chen, a sophomore at Brooklyn College.
Jian Wu was stopped and frisked in the Bronx while coming home alone late at night. “I have been stopped by a police officer a while ago for possession of illegal narcotics,” said Jian Wu, a Chinese local who lives in the Bronx. The reason the police gave him for them frisking him was because he was alone in Bronx at night. After the search, Jian was found clean and was released without charges.
Many recent immigrants don’t know their rights. “Asians that get stopped and searched by police usually don’t know their amendment rights because they believe that police have the power to do as they please,” said Edward Lin, a senior of College of Staten Island. The Fourth Amendment protects individuals against unreasonable searches and seizures by police officers. This means that police officers are not allowed to search people without a reasonable suspicion. Those who do not know about the Fourth Amendment typically submit to the police and let them search them because they believe that police officers have the authority to do whatever they want. Immigrants that came from China believe that police officers in the U.S. can search them the same way as police do in China.
The situation is particularly stressful for illegal immigrants because they are afraid of being stopped and question by police officers.
“Illegal immigrants have a huge fear of being stopped, questioned, or searched because they don’t have any legal identification on them,” said Eliot Wu, a sophomore at Hunter College.
The main reason illegal immigrants are so scared of being around the presence of police is because of their citizen status. They are scared of being deported. When a police officer stops to search them and they are unable to show any form of identification of themselves, they are taken to the police station. Once they are taken to the police station, they are forced to identify themselves or they may face harsher convictions for identity fraud or for being unwilling to cooperate with police. If the police find out they are illegal immigrants, there are sent back to their country and face severe punishment, unless they are married to a U.S. citizen.
 It’s a problem all over the city, not just in Chinatown. “No matter where you go-Toys ‘R’ US, Best Buy, Walmart-racial profiling will still exist because of the mentality that if people dress or look a different way, then they might be a possible threat to the community,” said a police officer in the 68th precinct that was wished to remain anonymous.
“Personally, I don’t use racial profiling, but if I get a call and the individual or group fits into the description, then I have no choice but to search them,” he said.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Green Fashion Costs More Green

By Zina Paschal
Staff Writer
“Everything we do has an impact on the environment, so developing chemicals and materials that don’t produce negative discharge is definitely worth it,” said Clem Von Holstein, a sales employee at Patagonia.
With the rise of environmental groups and green awareness, many clothing companies have adopted the idea of producing clothing made of organic materials.
However, along with these fibers and materials come higher prices. But is it worth it?
Many people believe that the price is worth the cause while others tend to think that it is too expensive.
Patagonia is one store that believes that going green with their fashion, in the name of saving the environment, is worth the higher prices.
Yvon Chouinard, an environmentalist, started Patagonia. He specialized in outdoor clothing and gear with the use of organic material and recycled fibers.
At first glance you would think you were walking into a mountain climbing store. Behind the counter hangs a huge picture of the Patagonian Mountains, located in Argentina. Coats and jackets cover the walls and serve as decorations for the reddish bricks. Fleece sweaters and vests of all sizes from kids to women to men cover the racks of the store alongside flannels of all colors.  One can tell that this store is different from others just by the feeling of the material between your fingertips.
Von Holstein said, “Working at Patagonia is one of the best things that have happened to me.”
He is also an environmentalist, so he strongly believes that stores like this are essential in helping to protect the planet.
The way organic clothing is produced does not contribute to the depletion of natural resources. Stores like Patagonia use resources such as cotton and wool to make their products. The quality of the clothing tends to be more appealing because the material is richer in color. It also feels softer to the hands.
American Apparel is also a supporter of green fashion. With their oversized hats, infinity scarves, lace dresses, high-waist leggings and pants, and grandpa sweater, the stores brings you back to the 80s. The colors of the clothing play as highlighters, which illuminate the store with loads of vintage charisma. The majority of their cotton t-shirts, sweaters, and dresses are made of organic fibers and cotton, which is used for its sustainability.
Rachel Masters, an employee at American Apparel said, “It is always better to use less and although it is more expensive to produce organic clothing right now, it will pay off in the future and will help the environment.”
She is all for her store carrying organic t-shirts and sweaters.  Many people may step into American Apparel and may only focus on the bright colored scarves, body suits, leg warmers and t-shirts without being aware that most of the apparel is made of organic cotton. After all with their 80s vibe, the green thought doesn’t automatically pop into your head. This goes to show how clothing can still be fashionable and trendy with a good cause behind it.
Eric Kunevera, an employee at American Apparel, believes that since the clothing is made “right,” meaning organic, one does not have to feel guilty about wearing organic clothing. Kunevera believes that organic clothing gives customers choices and a variety in clothing. “Carrying organic clothing in our stores allows customers to choose between regular clothing and organic,” said Kunevera. “We even have customers who specifically ask for organic tees and if we do not have them, they do not buy.”
While there are many who are for fashion going green, some do not understand or see the impact that it has on the environment. Collin Powers, a shopper at American Apparel said, “I think organic clothing is good but I do not know what impact it has on the environment.”
Although he shops at American Apparel, he doesn’t do it for the organic aspect of it. He simply likes the clothing.
Not everyone will understand how such a small article of clothing can contribute to sustaining the environment.
Seanella Abraham, a student at New York University and frequent shopper has no hopes in the fashion going green process. Although she shops on a weekly basis, according to her, she does not keep an eye out for organic clothing. Like Powers, she also does not see how this helps the environment.
“I do not think organic clothing helps the environment and it doesn’t really matter if fashion goes green,” said Abraham. “There are millions of other things that are affecting the environment so buying expensive clothing because it is eco-friendly it is not going to make a difference on the environment.”
It is clear that this student has better things to worry about besides the environment.
Emari Parsons, a student at the Fashion Institute of Technology, and also a savvy shopper said, “Going green just makes everything expensive and people will buy things that are not organic because it is cheaper.  Only people who are environment friendly will contribute to the whole organic fashion stuff.”
Organic clothing is pricier than regular clothing so many are discouraged to buy it.
Again, is it worth it for fashion to go green? Environmentalists and people who have the money to purchase organic and eco-friendly clothing will support the cause while others who do not have the money won’t.
“There’s no point in organic clothing or fashion, it’s just a waste of money,” said Parsons.

Protestors React To Black Friday

By Hassan Mokaddam
Staff Writer
Protestors felt consumers on Black Friday were unconsciously giving corporations what they wanted, more money in the bank.
On the eve of every Black Friday, consumers line up for hours waiting to purchase cheap products. A survey conducted in 2010 by The National Retail Federation showed an estimate of 212 million shoppers visited stores and websites over the holiday weekend. And this year was no different.
Although consumers were excited to join the lines for  Black Friday deals, protestors continued protesting.
Behind the barricades of Zuccotti Park was former Philadelphia police captain Ray Lewis. Lewis was arrested for participating in Occupy Wall Street last month, but that has not stopped him from protesting.
Lewis, wearing his full uniform proudly, said, “Shopping doesn’t help anyone. It only helps the billionaires.”
Lewis believes corporations are brainwashing people.
“On Black Friday, I went to get toothpaste, and I saw just so much shopping bags and poor people carrying junk; stuff that they totally didn’t need,” he said. “All that materialistic stuff, this is what corporate America wants. They want people to think that they need all this stuff to be happy. It’s all brainwashing.”
Standing beside Lewis was Xiamara Hayes, a New York State licensed special education teacher.
Hayes was holding up a sign that said, “Elephants and asses are poisoning the masses.”
Hayes was shocked to see how many people were lining up for Black Friday. She felt it was her obligation to let consumers know she was fighting for them.
“I was really dismayed to see the thousands of people running like mindless individuals to give their money to the corporations in this time of need,” she said. “It’s just very upsetting to see that the people do not understand what we are fighting for. We are trying to wake the people up, but they are turning their noses up, and I do not know what has to happen to them.”
Nearing the entrance of the park was another protestor named John Nicholson. Nicholson is a laid off EMS worker. He did not feel spending money was necessarily a bad thing.
“I have a 50/50 opinion,” he said. “I feel Black Friday is great for the 99% because it’s the only time of the year they can afford something; that’s good for us. If anything, Black Friday should be every day.”
Nicholson also understood why some are against Black Friday.
“We are feeding the corporate greed. It’s that simple” he said. “But for me, I stand neutral.”
Between shopping or protesting, Nicholson recommended we do both.
“You can be both, it’s not being hypocritical or against Occupy Wall Street. Everyone is in a financial disaster. If a TV is on sale for $100, I say go for it.”
Gilbert Gambucci, another protestor, is an international educator, and a social scientist who published a popular blog focusing on the origin of our current economic crisis at www.promiseland.info.
Gambucci believes we should stop supporting the 1%.
“There’s a very big inversion that takes place in society where the 99% think that the 1% is necessary, that we need them,” he said. “Instead, it is the fact that the 1% needs the 99%.”
Gambucci believed not many people understood the protest, or the economic issues they are fighting against.
“They would understand that better if everyone, for example, stopped buying for one day,” he said. “Companies would fold up, and then they would realize who the 99% are. We need to get the point where we have to stop buying from them.”
Though people questioned the protest, Gambucci was patient.
“It takes a little time for consciousness to get everybody,” he said. “We are here fighting for the rest of the people who don’t even know what’s going on.”
Gambucci was still hopeful that, in time, people would listen. “There’s a certain type of patience we have to have with the people, and I am ready to wait” he said.
While the protest might not be going on in Zuccotti Park, the Occupy Wall Street Movement is still going strong.

QuickLinks: Law School

Best Schools for Public Service

the National Jurist

Murder Mystery

The Long Island serial killings of women prostitutes have become a mystery even being called “the Gilgo Beach Murder mystery.” Many experts believe that there are multiple killers due to the number of victims, the different methods used in disposing the body, and the number of years that separate the murders. Louis B. Schlesinger, Professor of Forensic Psychology at John Jay College of Criminal Justice believes there is only one serial killer. Despite the number of victims and the gap in years between the first murder and the last, 15 years, he still believes there is one murderer. In response to the reason why the victims were dismembered in the past but are no longer, Schlesinger  explains that

English: Knife Fox Italiano: Coltello Fox

Image via Wikipedia

the killer must have just realized that it was too much work and decided to switch up his methods.

Chancellor Goldstein’s Visit Sparks Protest

Chancellor Matthew Goldstein

By Desiree Mathurin and Eric Jankiewicz

 

“May I remind you to remain respectful when asking Chancellor Goldstein questions,” the President of John Jay College Jeremy Travis said to an audience of students, faculty, and members of CUNY. But what was supposed to be a Q & A quickly turned into students demanding cheaper tuition.

On Dec. 1st the audience members gathered at the Box Black Theater at 1:30 pm to listen to Chancellor Matthew Goldstein talk about CUNY affairs, mainly the recent tuition hikes that have created much controversy among CUNY staff and students.

Goldstein started off the discussion by mentioning that his pledge, when he became Chancellor, was to “create an integrated community” within the CUNY system. He said he understood that in this new world a college education is vital and without it a person’s standing is void.

Outside, students were gathering to protest recent tuition increases. “We demand that CUNY be free,” they chanted in front of John Jay on 10th avenue between 59th and 58th street. A crowd of CUNY law enforcement officers, students and professors gathered minutes after the demonstration started. A broadcaster from the CUNY funded ‘Democracy Now’ news outlet was there, too. The professors who were there joined the protestors in chanting and gave them words of encouragement.

“The tuition increase is a regressive tax,” Economics Professor Joan Hoffman told The John Jay Sentinel. “It’s refreshing to see these students finally get it and are doing something about it.”

Hoffman expressed regret about not seeing more students join the protest.

Niokka Jackson was a student that was just watching the protest. When asked why she wasn’t joining she said, “These protestors need to become more organized.” She also did not like that some of the chants included profanities like “We own this fucking city.”

Sociology Professor Rick Richardson was enthusiastic to see the students fighting the tuition hikes. “I fully support this.” At times he jumped into the chants.

“There are ample funds to make CUNY affordable, if not free,” he said while catching his breath.

Inside the college, Goldstein was saying the exact opposite. “To have a discussion about free tuition is fine but it will lead to nothing. It’s not going to happen.”

The new tuition increases was what most of the students were there for. He said that this new hike is a “rational tuition policy.” He believed that the new hikes would enable John Jay and other CUNY colleges to add more faculty members, and to overall strengthen student services.

At the beginning of his tenure as Chancellor he was “deeply concerned” with the way public education was being treated. He stated that, “public higher education in the U.S. is under serious assault” and that “we face a real national security issue” because the state was not providing enough money to adequately support higher education.

Goldstein claimed that this new tuition hike would go directly back to John Jay and CUNY to, “keep this important institution safe.”

Goldstein and the Board of Trustees helped Governor Andrew Cuomo enact the NYSUNY 2020 Challenge Grant Program. This plan increases tuition up to $300 per year for five years. It also says that the State must, “maintain financial support to SUNY from year to year.” This means the budget for SUNY and CUNY cannot decrease from the previous year’s budget.  This is called “maintenance of effort.”

Goldstein believes that to make John Jay and CUNY better institutions, students must, “share the responsibility with generating revenue.” He also mentioned that although students will feel the tuition hikes, “58% of students pay nothing” for tuition.

The next topic Goldstein addressed was his enthusiasm to fix the community college’s reputation. He mentioned that before his reform the graduation rate for the community colleges was 20% and now it has been raised to “between 55% and 57%.”

As Goldstein was saying these things, certain students became impatient. Domingo Estevez purposely put his phone on the loudest setting so that Goldstein’s voice was constantly accompanied by his ringer and every so often he would yell, “Your 10 minutes are up” to Goldstein.

Undeterred, Goldstein continued without pause.  Then Goldstein finished and the floor was open to anyone. Students that were previously protesting outside had come into the theater and they all had their hands up, ready to ask Goldstein about the tuition hikes.

Kenneth Cruz, one of the organizers of the protest, said to Goldstein, “Most of us will no longer be able to afford going here because of the tuition hikes.” And, “Within five years most people attending CUNY won’t be able to go here anymore.”

Goldstein responded, “That was spoken eloquently and straight to the point.” He suggested that he and students should “be working together to lobby Albany” as a way of reducing tuition hikes.

Another student activist present at the discussion, Sally Abdelghafar, also thought students should be working with the chancellor. “I would ask the chancellor to join our movement,” she explained.  Abdelghafar was one of the organizers for one of their first protests on Oct. 5th,. During the Oct. protest she had one of the loudest voices in the crowd. But not this time. Something had changed since last time and it wasn’t her. Abdelghafar didn’t agree with how the student protestors conducted themselves with Goldstein.

During the discussion, students often interrupted Goldstein and once they broke out into a brief chant, “Students united will never be divided.”

Towards the end one student had burst into tears and yelled at Goldstein for the tuition hikes. Goldstein soon gave up the discussion and walked off stage without a word, leaving Travis baffled as to what to do next.

In these next coming months the student protestors are likely to continue their movement. The question now becomes how will they go about arguing their agendas? Will it be filled with profanity and shouts? Or will they do something else, like what Abdelghafar believes about working with Goldstein?